研究

论文

已发布，除 PDF 外，全文也刊在本站。

1. Door-to-door time against in-vehicle time across European corridors

   已发布

   Shramish Kafle，Orlero

   发布于 2026年9月18日，版本 1.0.0PDF，共 5 页

   摘要

   Journey planners and timetable feeds report in-vehicle time. Travellers experience door-to-door time, which adds access, egress and the waiting that a filed connection imposes. This paper asks how far the two diverge across European corridors, and whether the divergence is large enough to change which mode is ranked fastest. Using a snapshot of 936 filed itineraries on 493 European corridors, every itinerary is decomposed into in-vehicle time, filed interchange time and a parameterised access and egress allowance. In-vehicle time accounts for a median of 77% of door-to-door time, with an interquartile range of 57 to 87.3%. On the 79 corridors where two or more modes are filed, the mode ranked fastest changes on 13 of them, 16.5%, when the clock changes from in-vehicle to door to door. The reversals are produced almost entirely by filed interchange time rather than by the access and egress allowance: every one of the 13 reversals also occurs when the allowance is set to zero, and the reversal rate moves only between 16.5 and 20.3% across the full range of allowances tested. A planner can therefore correct most of the bias in in-vehicle time using data it already holds, without first resolving the access-time parameter that the literature disagrees about.

   阅读论文Corridor timetablesOperator coverage

   标题和摘要为英文。论文是以特定措辞作出的主张，若译文中的统计表述与 PDF 有出入，那就成了第二篇更弱的论文。其余内容都以您的语言呈现。

发布方式

署名，论文如此，其下的数据也如此

正文、表格、图形与公开数据，全部采用 CC BY 4.0。可以引用、重绘，也可以用于商业用途。请注明 Orlero 并附上回链。

先发布数据，再作出主张

这里的每篇论文都列出它所读取的数据集，每一个都已在 /data 上公开，并带有版本与校验和。分析程序读取这些文件，同时写出 PDF 中的表格和页面上的图形，因此两种呈现不可能给出不同的数字。

数字是生成的，不是誊抄的

页面和 PDF 由同一个结果文件构建，该文件由分析脚本从已提交的数据写出；测试会重算整套分析，只要两者中有一处偏离就会失败。

尚无 DOI

Zenodo 的存档已准备好但尚未发布，因此请引用网址和版本号。

利益冲突写在论文本身

作者是 Orlero 的创始人，而这些论文中有一篇部分是对 Orlero 排序方法的批评。

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/